Republican activists
are asking an interesting question, “why isn’t Romney winning?” One reason is the past history of failed
Republican policies which led to the worst economic downturn and the lowest job
creation record since the great depression.
While Republicans try to claim that if given a “do over” they will not
make the same mistakes as before, all of their policy pronouncements continue
to focus on the very things that turned the economy to shit. Since 1979, the only group of people who
have experienced growth in income or wealth has been the top 10%. When the rich are able to win big tax cuts
it leads to underinvestment in infrastructure, education and technology,
impeding the engines of growth. Most economists agree on the need for stronger
education, better matching of skills with job opportunities, and an effort to
overhaul the nation's fiscal policy, including taxes. The 10 percent, in spite of their wealth, cannot spend enough to
create the demand needed to create jobs and turn around the economy. While federal safety-net and
social-insurance programs have helped to keep poverty lower than it would
otherwise be. Some 21.4 million Americans would be in poverty were it not for
Social Security income, including 14.5 million people over age 65 and others
who are on disability insurance. The
share of Americans who don't have health insurance declined in 2011, in part
because of rising enrollment in Medicaid, the federal-and-state program for the
poor. Programs including food stamps (now known as the SNAP program) and the
Earned Income Tax Credit have a significant impact also on keeping those who
lost their jobs because of the failure of supply-side economics from living on
the streets. Rick Santorum and House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, at the Value
Voters’ Summit, used their speeches to
paint the 2012 race as a transformational moment in the country's history and
insist that the president is turning the nation into a place its founders
wouldn't recognize. In reality, it is
Santorum, Cantor, and others on the right who have so bastardized the Founding
Fathers that even Ben Franklin would not recognize the Republican re-write of
their views.
As for why Romney is
losing, just ask the average woman how she feels about federal, state, and
local legislators inserting themselves between a woman and her doctor. Ask a minority how their interests are being
represented by a party that wants to repeal the Dream Act if ever passed by Congress. Ask African Americans how they feel about
electing people who continue to accuse them of being lazy, living off of
welfare checks, and imprisoning a significant percentage of their male
population. The Republican party has
become a party of rich white men and Mitt Romney exemplifies that vision. The real question is what reasons is Mitt
and other Republicans offering to deserve the votes of Americans. Not being Obama is not enough. While it may energized the base, there are
not enough voters in the base to win a national election. Romney was able to buy his win as the
Republican nominee, but those who voted for him to win the Republican
nomination constitute less than 10% ot the total electorate. In addition, the only thing Romney can say
about winning the Republican nomination is that he was better than the reat of
the candidates for the Presidential nomination. That in itself is not saying much. A four wheeled race car will usually beat a three wheeled car
around the track.
Then there is the
Ryan problem. Americans are tired of being
lied to and Ryan may have set a political convention record for the most untrue
statements ever made in a single acceptance speech. To make matters even worse, he lied about his marathon times as
well as about being against the stimulus program while writing various agencies
for stimulus money for his district.
His hypocrisy regarding Simpson/Bowles was guaranteed not to win him any
votes as well.
Why isn’t Romney
winning??? It is obvious. The Romney/Ryan ticket is too fucked up to
win a national election. This has to be the weakest ticket which came from the weakest field of candidates in modern times. Even Rush thinks so!
No comments:
Post a Comment