Today’s debate
involves the role of government. On the
right, the call is for smaller government, lower taxes, and fewer
regulations. The right claims that
policies that result in smaller government, lower taxes, and fewer regulations
will benefit the economy and help all Americans. While economic history does not support this claim, the right
continues to march to this drummer. One
question they continually ignore is how these policies actually benefit
Americans. Private business has not
been very effective in controlling the fires in the west. Private business has not helped easing the
devastation of the floods in the south.
Private business also has not been very effective in improving the
education of our children. While private
business will eventually profit from the aforementioned disasters and will
profit from privatizing education, private business will not do any of these
things for those who cannot afford to pay the costs and fees assessed by
private business. It is a fact that
smaller government fails to put out fires, protect us from floods, or keep our
neighborhoods safe. What’s more, those
calling for smaller government do not raise their voices when they are
personally benefiting from government largess.
When the debate whether federal flood insurance programs should include
second homes, those on the right (who own the most second homes) insisted on
this inclusion. When the debate
involves various tax benefits, exemptions, and exclusions for investment income
and other non-wage income, the biggest beneficiaries (again, those on the
right) call for the continuation of these benefits. The voices for smaller government say nothing about the true SOCIALIZED programs that benefit corporate farms, sugar and corn producers, and other agriculture subsidies. Finally, to hear Romney and other spokes-persons on the right,
people with various government jobs such as teachers, police, and firefighters
are not deserving of either their jobs or the wages and benefits that go with
these jobs. There is a vital role of
government and it is time to recognize and be willing to pay the costs of
competent government. For too long, the
“smaller government” voices have failed to call for competent government and
the time has come to increase the demand for the most competent rather than the
cheapest government or smallest government at all levels.
No comments:
Post a Comment