What makes anyone
think Romney would do a better job as President than George W. Bush. Both were “businessmen” before becoming
governors. Both have surrounded
themselves with the same group of advisers.
Both claimed that lowering tax rates and eliminating regulations would
grow the economy. What makes Romney any
different? Failed policies are failed
policies whether put in place in 2001 or in 2013. Eliminating regulations for businesses did possibly result in
business profiting, but eliminating regulations also contributed to the larges
economic downturn since the Great Depression.
Lowering taxes benefited the wealthiest ten percent but did absolutely
nothing for everyone else. Today there
is a greater disparity between the wealthy and the rest of the country than
before the Great Depression. Since
1979, the middle class in America, the engine that really drives the American
economy has been shrinking. There is no
economic history to support the idea that lowering taxes on the wealthy would
change that and grow the middle class.
While Romney claims he does not favor the wealthy, just look at his tax
proposals. He claims he will lower
taxes on the bottom group from 10 percent to 8 percent. This would save $200 in taxes on each
$10,000 of taxable income. On the other
hand, his proposal would lower taxes from 39.5 percent to 28 percent for the
top marginal rate. By doing this, the
wealthy would save $1150 on each $10,000 of taxable income. In Romneyworld, giving the richest
Americans 5.75 times more reductions does not benefit the middle class. Also do not forget Romney’s plans to eliminate tax on both
capital gains and inheritance, designed to only benefit Romney and people like Romney while reducing tax receipts and adding even more to the deficit. In
Romneyworld, neither capital gains, dividends, carried interest, or inheritance
should be taxed. Apparently Romney believes that the country would be better
off with only the rich ruling. Perhaps
this thinking is in line with his father having been born in Mexico where only
the wealthy actually rule. There are
only two reasons to vote for Mitt Romney: (1)You are wealthy enjoy most of your
income in the form of capital gains and dividends, and will have an AGI in
excess of $250,000 per year. (2) He is not Obama. Neither of those reasons will grow the middle class, create jobs,
or speed up the recovery. In fact,
based upon the results of the last “businessman” who was President and that he
is receiving the economic and foreign affairs advice from those who gave
guidance to Bush 43, it is very likely things under Romney will get much, much
worse. American needs neither another
recession or war with Iraq.
No comments:
Post a Comment